1. Home
  2. Health
  3. Sexuality
Cory Silverberg
Sexuality Blog

By Cory Silverberg, About.com Guide to Sexuality

New Circumcision and Sexual Satisfaction Study a Cut Above

Wednesday January 9, 2008
98% of men reported sexual satisfaction and normal sexual function after circumcision

A study, published in the January issue of BJU International, sheds more light on the impact of circumcision on male sexual satisfaction and function. It also significantly raises the bar in terms of methodology and reduced rhetoric in a research area that is highly politicized and fraught with problems.

The study involved 4, 456 sexually experienced Ugandan men (aged 15 to 49) who were HIV negative. All men were scheduled to receive circumcision, however one group was circumcised as soon as the study began and a second group was circumcised 2 years later. Researchers looked at sexual desire, satisfaction and function in both groups at six, 12, and 24 months. Their findings included:

  • 98.6 per cent of the circumcised men reported no problems in penetration, compared with 99.4 per cent of the control group.
  • 99.4 per cent of the circumcised men reported no pain on intercourse, compared with 98.8 per cent of the control group.
  • Sexual satisfaction was more or less constant in the circumcision group – 98.5 per cent on enrolment and 98.4 per cent after two years – but rose slightly from 98 per cent to 99.9 per cent in the control group. This difference was not felt to be clinically significant.
  • At the six-month visit there was a small, but statistically significant, difference in problems with penetration and pain among the circumcised group, but this was temporary and was not reported at subsequent follow-up visits.

The authors point out that the gains in sexual function and satisfaction may be a result of the education and treatment received by participants during the study. If a participant disclosed a sexual problem they were referred for treatment.

While this study represents the largest randomized examination of this issue, and in my opinion the researchers do a much better job of acknowledging and minimizing their bias than in many other surveys of sexual satisfaction and circumcision, it is not without limitations.

As the authors themselves point out, both groups reported remarkably low sexual dissatisfaction and sexual dysfunction at the start of the study. Less than 2% of all participants in this Ugandan study reported dissatisfaction or dysfunction, compared to 7% in an earlier trial in Kenya. Figures in the U.S. of erectile dysfunction in the same age group (20-49) are around 6.5%.

They also point out that it was not possible to keep the circumcision status of participants from those administering the study, as such researcher bias is a possibility. Questions about satisfaction and function were asked in face to face interviews, and, as with all sex research, there is a distinct possibility that study participants’ responses were not completely honest.

Not mentioned by the authors is the fact that the number of participants who were circumcised and stayed with the study to the two year mark was very small. While the majority of participants came back at six and twelve months, less than half returned at the two year point. While we can’t know what this means exactly, it may point to this group as being less than representative.

In terms of the studies ability to say something general about sexual satisfaction, there were other methodological limitations. Sexual satisfaction was evaluated solely on the basis of satisfaction with intercourse. While it’s reasonable to focus on intercourse as an activity that is likely to be impacted by circumcision, this research fails to take into account any other sexual acts, thus limiting what we can say about the findings. They also failed to ask participants about how prominent a role intercourse played in their sex lives. So while they may be happy with the intercourse, it’s possible their overall satisfaction went up or down, depending on what they value most in their sex lives.

A final element of this study which I think is particularly exciting is the overall connection the researchers are making to sexual pleasure. Whether one agrees with their agenda or not they are realizing that sexual pleasure is a key part of sexual health promotion and intervention. The fact is that we need more talk about sexual pleasure in all sexual health discussions, whether its about STD prevention, sexual assault prevention, or promotion of healthy sexual behaviors. This study takes an important step in the right direction.

Read more – Sex and Circumcision

Related - Circumcision Info. from About Pediatrics; Circumcision Info. from About Pregnancy/Childbirth

Source:: Kigozi, G., Watya, S., Polis, C.B., et al. “The Effect of Male Circumcision on Sexual Satisfaction and Function, Results from a Randomized Trial of Male Circumcision for Human Immunodeficiency Virus Prevention, Rakai, Uganda” BJU International Vol. 101, No. 1 (2008): 65-70.

Photo credit: Blaise Hayward/Getty Images

Comments
January 9, 2008 at 8:56 am
(1) Mark Lyndon says:

There was a study published in the March 2007 issue of BJU International on “The Effect Of Male Circumcision On Sexuality”:

“About 6% answered that their sex lives improved, while 20% reported a worse sex life after circumcision.

This study suggests that adult circumcision adversely affects sexual function in a significant number of men, and the authors suggest that it may be due to loss of nerve endings in the removed skin. In addition, there was an approximately 9% incidence of severe penile scarring or uncomfortable erections from curvature or tethering after circumcision.”

http://tinyurl.com/2fjtxb

January 9, 2008 at 11:08 am
(2) William Howard says:

Your article on male genital mutilation is all pure bunk. The foreskin was put there by nature to help a male in sexual intercourse and having orgasms. Mutilating the penis like circumcision does, desentizes the penis nerves and over time damages the penis sensativity beyond repair. Cut your own penis off if you want. Leave mine and the unborn male babies penises alone, thank you very much..

January 9, 2008 at 11:21 pm
(3) Hugh says:

It’s good to see that I’m not the only one who sees a lot of problems with this study – mainly that it has such an obvious agenda. The paper itself describes its results as “reassuring”. As you say, but I can’t find it in the study itself, remarkably few of the men, whether circumcised or not, reported any problems at all – far fewer than, for example, in the Laumann studies. Maybe Uganda is a sexual paradise and we should all go there! But it’s more likely that the study and its circumstances just weren’t sensitive enough. More at The Intactivism Pages.

March 3, 2008 at 7:19 pm
(4) Steve says:

Really good to see what everyone knows already. Cut or not sex is still great.

April 28, 2008 at 10:53 am
(5) Austin says:

I was born at home and therefore not circumcised as a chile. I had been married for 43 years and my wife was very supportive of me wanting to be circumcised. So at 64 I was. Finally, I can experience feeling her vagina while moving both in and out. Uncircumcised the outstroke was me moving within my own foreskin. Regrets, yes, that I didn’t have the procedure done along with the vacetomy when I was 32. She says sex is also better for her.

February 3, 2009 at 2:48 am
(6) sathyam says:

uncurcumsised is better sensitivity and
better intercourse and musterbation pleasure
all the sensity is there all time

August 20, 2009 at 10:07 am
(7) jock19 says:

Had it both ways and I agree that sexual pleasure has just increased over the last period since being a roundhead.

September 21, 2009 at 1:47 am
(8) Am I the only one... says:

who is a little suspicious of the articles bias after seeing that the author is Larry “Silverberg”
hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

December 19, 2009 at 6:14 am
(9) FredR says:

Infant circumcision should not be compaired to adult circ which is after puberty’s brain chemistry has matured. Because different infants end up with different sized penis’ after puberty, infant circs will end up causing a larger variety of outcomes after puberty. MINE RIPPED AT THE PEE HOLE AND NOT ENOUGH SKIN CAUSED PAINFUL ERECTIONS AND UGLY SCARS AND REMOVED ALL THE GEE STRING NERVES RESULTING IN E. D. and suicidal depression and a need to take revenge.

Leave a Comment

Line and paragraph breaks are automatic. Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title="">, <b>, <i>, <strike>

Explore Sexuality
About.com Special Features

8 Ways to Cut Drug Costs

Learn how to save money on medications with these recommendations. More >

Healthy Bodies, Healthy Minds

Keep yourself, and your family, happy and healthy this season. More >

  1. Home
  2. Health
  3. Sexuality

©2009 About.com, a part of The New York Times Company.

All rights reserved.