The Vibrator Goes Mainstream, Again
Last week electronics manufacturer Phillips released the first three products in their newly created “Relationship Care” line. Two of the products are vibrators (to the right is the Intimate Warming Massager) each selling only in the UK for around $150.
Before the official launch a few articles touted the move as radical and without precedent. Given the launch a few years ago of lower quality vibrating toys by both Durex and Trojan (both of which have proved hugely successful for the publicly traded companies SSL and Church and Dwight, respectively) I don’t think this expansion into sexual health can really be called either radical or new. But Phillips is doing it differently and while I haven’t yet got my hands on the products all signs look good.
The toys are not disposable and Phillips has clearly invested more in creating retailing infrastructure than either Durex or Trojan (whose products are selling well despite the fact that there’s no real home for them in most bricks and mortar drug stores and are often crammed in behind condoms and bottles of lubricant).
The best news to my mind is that when a large corporation decides to make sex toys they think about things like customer satisfaction and liability. The result is that we’re going to get safer, better made toys (when compared to the big sex toy manufacturers, but not necessarily better than the smaller boutique companies like Jimmy Jane, OhMiBod, etc…) and we’re going to get the kind of customer service we’re used to only from high end sex toy retailers, but you’re getting it direct from the manufacturer.
Take, for example, the support page for the Warm Intimate Massager. It might not seem like much if you’re used to support pages for software or other consumer goods, but it’s thoroughness is unheard of in the sex toy industry.
It’s also helpful for those of us who believe that sexual pleasure is part of sexual health to have a huge multinational company essentially make a public statement that people have sex and that it can be a good thing for them to experience pleasure when they have sex. While I wish we didn’t have to take these social cues from for profit companies, we do. And the advertising campaigns and media push that accompany each of these moves into mainstream sex toy retailing offers us another opportunity to talk about the importance of sexual pleasure to sexual health.
What isn’t being written about is that this launch comes at a fascinating time in the sex toy industry and sex toy retailing. I’ll be writing more on that later. In the meantime, if I can get my hands on the product and a transformer, I’ll let you know whether the reality lives up to the hype.
Read more – Times Online: Philips changes the mood with Warm Intimate Massager
Image of courtesy of Phillips.


Wonderful article Cory! It’s good to see that a company like Phillips would begin to market and sell vibrators. They are a very healthy aspect to many single people and couple’s sex lives.
You didn’t mention that Philips markets its toys expressly to couples. “Gets you both hot”, ect. They have apparently done excessive research and found out that XY per cent of people would use sextoys if they were aimed at both of them.
Aren’t sextoys, after all, most of the time used by one participant if the other is not at hand? And: What is different with these products? You could use an ordinary vibrator the same way (i.e. “together”) as the Philips massagers.
But I wonder if it’s not just trying to get a bite of an expanding market while at the same time avoiding any filthy associations.
I did leave out the way they’re marketing to couples, although Durex and Trojan are essentially doing the same thing. Your question about how many people use sex toys alone as opposed to using with partners is an interesting one and, of course, we have no research on that sadly. Anecdotally after working in sex toy stores for over 20 years I’d say that the majority do use on their own, although the number of people who have tried to use their sex toy with a partner or occasionally use a sex toy with a partner is considerable.
As for their motives, they are always money,that’s what regular undemocratic businesses exist for. That said, if they’re making the argument that sexual pleasure is a part of sexual health, whether its self serving or not, I’m happy to exploit it for sexual health purposes!
this is the best articale that I have read in a long time.